State v. Propotnik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the defendant’s statement to the store owner was not a confession within the meaning of section 634.03 because the statement was exculpatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Colvin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 64×
• State v. Heiges
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-08-17· cited 27×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Crosby
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-05-26· cited 23×