State v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “proof of intent to commit a crime must necessarily rest on a permissible inference reasonably to be drawn from all of the facts and circumstances proved” when apprehension of the suspect occurred before anything in the building was taken or disturbed
• holding that \proof of intent to commit a crime must necessarily rest on a permissible inference reasonably to be drawn from all of the facts and circumstances proved\ when apprehension of the suspect occurred before anything in the building was taken or disturbed
• upholding burglary conviction of man found in drunken stupor inside building he had entered without consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Colvin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 64×
• State v. Larson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-14· cited 18×
• State v. Adamson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-02· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Crosby
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-05-26· cited 23×
• State v. Bonga
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-09-29· cited 17×