Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/16/2005
State v. Crandall
Citations
- 108 P.3d 16
- 197 Or. App. 591
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant had not abandoned those interests
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Linder, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CrandallOregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 20×
- State v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-18· cited 12×
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-13· cited 10×
- State v. HemenwayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-12-09· cited 7×
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-12· cited 7×
- State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 6×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 138×
- State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 42×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-13· cited 27×
- State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-26· cited 22×
- State v. Blair/VanisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-22· cited 18×
- State v. CanapeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-06-02· cited 17×
- State v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 14×
- State v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-07-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.