Skip to main content

State v. Covington

Citations

  • 539 S.E.2d 67
  • 343 S.C. 157
  • 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a clear and convincing standard need not be applied when juror concealment cannot first be proven under the lesser preponderance of the evidence standard
  • requiring a showing of prejudice when a defendant seeks a new trial on the basis of juror misconduct
  • stating that when a motion for a new trial is based upon allegations that a juror’s answers on voir dire were incomplete or misleading, the trial judge’s denial of that motion will be affirmed absent a prejudicial abuse of discretion
  • adopting Aldret procedure in a case involving alleged intentional concealment during voir dire
  • finding evidence of juror misconduct is evaluated under a clear and convincing standard
  • “Given the conflicting evidence [regarding whether juror misconduct had occurred], we defer to the sound judgment of the trial judge in resolving a disputed factual issue and, therefore, find no abuse of discretion on his part.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stilwell, Howard, Shuler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.