Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/26/2007
State v. Cottrell
Citations
- 215 Or. App. 276
- 168 P.3d 1200
- 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an officer’s observations of the defendant’s bloodshot, watery eyes, odor of alcohol, and “inattentive and messy eating” supported a finding of reasonable suspicion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Haselton, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-24· cited 229×
- State v. KostaOregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-30· cited 77×
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 39×
- State v. KostaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-10-16· cited 22×
- State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-04· cited 19×
- State v. KolendarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-31· cited 15×
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22· cited 9×
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-04-17· cited 6×
- State v. LiebrechtCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.