State v. Berg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasonable suspicion justified officer asking defendant to step out of car, and defendant voluntarily consented
• a police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe that a motorist has driven while intoxicated where the officer observes the motorist’s bloodshot eyes and smells alcohol on the motorist’s breath
• bloodshot eyes and odor of alcohol on a driver’s breath created reasonable suspicion
• officer was acting within his authority when he had reasonable suspicion that defendant was driving under the influence of intoxicants and “asked defendant to get out of his car, and defendant consented to do so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-14· cited 7×
• State v. Hendricks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-11-19· cited 5×
• State v. Finlay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-11· cited 5×
• Petteys v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-13· cited 4×
• State v. Cottrell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-26· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dominguez-Martinez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-06-02· cited 88×
• State v. Williamson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-04-18· cited 61×
• State v. Aguilar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 40×