Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1/29/2001
State v. Cotton
Citations
- 778 So. 2d 569
- 2001 WL 69508
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In evaluating claims of double jeopardy under [Louisiana law and the Louisiana Constitution], Louisiana courts have used the ‘same evidence’ test, which ... is ‘somewhat broader in concept than Blockburger.' ” (citation omitted)
- “In evaluating claims of double jeopardy under [Louisiana law and the Louisiana Constitution], Louisiana courts have used the ‘same evidence’ test, which . . . is ‘somewhat broader in concept than Blockburger.’” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kimball
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2007-02-22· cited 96×
- State of Louisiana v. Joseph TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2016-12-01· cited 84×
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-04-03· cited 80×
- State v. Rodney J. Miles a/k/a Jamal D. Allen (077035) (Camden County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-05-16· cited 36×
- State v. AlemanLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2002-01-15· cited 26×
- State v. RidgleyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2009-01-13· cited 24×
- State v. LangleyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-04-06· cited 18×
- Quatrevingt v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-02-08· cited 17×
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-03-01· cited 14×
- State v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-05-12· cited 13×
- State v. GibsonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-02-04· cited 13×
- State v. CottonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2002-05-10· cited 12×
- State v. AndersonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-06-01· cited 12×
- State v. Otkins-VictorLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2016-05-26· cited 12×
- State of New Jersey v. J.M., Jr.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-11-21· cited 11×
- State v. BergeronLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-11-05· cited 10×
- State v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-12-28· cited 10×
- State v. BrumfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2012-11-29· cited 8×
- State v. PetittoLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-04-26· cited 8×
- People v. JonesColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 8×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 2,215×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- State v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-03-29· cited 910×
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 720×
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 544×
- United States v. FelixSupreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 537×
- State v. SteeleSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-09-24· cited 207×
- State v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-12-15· cited 157×
- United States v. BrackettFifth Circuit· 1997-05-21· cited 99×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-12-03· cited 77×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-10-20· cited 70×
- State v. BlacheSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1985-12-02· cited 60×
- United States v. John Allen SeleyNinth Circuit· 1992-02-25· cited 48×
- State v. DoucetSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-06-09· cited 27×
- Ivan Curtis Charles v. R.Q. Hickman, Warden Attorney General for the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2000-10-03· cited 13×
- State v. CottonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1997-11-07· cited 2×
- State v. CottonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-06-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.