State of New Jersey v. J.M., Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prosecution's proffered evidence that the defendant had sexually molested a customer in defendant's massage parlor did not logically suggest a motive to digitally penetrate the victim, only an alleged propensity
• holding that the prosecution's proffered evidence that the defendant had sexually molested a customer in defendant's massage parlor did not logically suggest a motive to digitally penetrate the victim, only an alleged propensity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).