State v. Cotton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We accept ... the fundamental tenet that the relationship between the individual and the state leaves no room for regulations which have as their purpose and effect solely the protection of the individual from his folly.”
• \We accept ... the fundamental tenet that the relationship between the individual and the state leaves no room for regulations which have as their purpose and effect solely the protection of the individual from his folly.\
• “We accept now ... the fundamental tenet that the relationship between the individual and the state leaves no room for regulations which have as their purpose and effect solely the protection of the individual from his own folly.”
• \We accept now . . . the fundamental tenet that the relationship between the individual and the state leaves no room for regulations which have as their purpose and effect solely the protection of the individual from his own folly.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lee v. Corregedore
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-10-03· cited 70×
• State v. Mallan
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1998-01-30· cited 53×
• People v. Kohrig
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-10-01· cited 41×
• Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-09-04· cited 39×
• Benning v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-01-28· cited 37×
• Buhl v. Hannigan
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-06-30· cited 27×
• State v. Kahalewai
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1975-10-21· cited 26×
• State v. Baker
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 24×
• State v. French
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1994-10-31· cited 20×
• State v. Romano
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-03-30· cited 20×
• People v. Poucher
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-12-21· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Kautz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-04· cited 8×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McGowan v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 3,439×
• Olmstead v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
• Nebbia v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1934-03-05· cited 1,848×
• Shelton v. Tucker
  Supreme Court· 1960-12-12· cited 1,729×
• Lawton v. Steele
  Supreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 909×
• Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead
  Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 810×
• Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1949-01-31· cited 673×
• Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. Sullivan
  Supreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 536×
• Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1959-05-25· cited 370×
• State v. Santiago
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1971-12-29· cited 256×
• Rose v. Bondurant
  Supreme Court· 1972-11-20· cited 84×
• State v. Gordon
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-07-24· cited 57×
• American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Department of State Police
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1968-04-30· cited 50×
• State v. Kantner
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1972-01-20· cited 48×
• State v. Lee
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1970-02-12· cited 36×
• Simon v. Sargent
  D. Massachusetts· 1972-06-28· cited 26×
• State v. Fetterly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-07-25· cited 23×
• Pacific Meat Co., Ltd. v. Otagaki
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1964-07-27· cited 17×
• Borden Co. v. McCrory
  E.D. Louisiana· 1959-01-07· cited 8×