Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 8/16/1985
State v. Cormier
Citations
- 127 N.H. 253
- 499 A.2d 986
- 1985 N.H. LEXIS 424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting evidentiary use of defendant’s refusal to submit to chemical testing
- privilege against self-incrimination “applies only to evidence provided by a defendant that is of testimonial character”
- “[A] defendant may suppress [blood alcohol test] evidence ... but in return he will lose his license for a time and his decision to suppress that evidence may itself be considered in determining whether he is guilty or civilly liable.”
- decided under part I, article 15 of the State Constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batchelder, Brock, Douglas, King, Soutbr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-05-12· cited 66×
- Knowles v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-10-31· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. D'AgostinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-11-09· cited 29×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-10-03· cited 25×
- State v. RoacheSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-07-15· cited 17×
- State v. HearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2004-07-15· cited 16×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-09-26· cited 15×
- State v. GodingSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-07-09· cited 14×
- State v. BarkusSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-10-31· cited 13×
- State v. LortonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-08-01· cited 12×
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-07-17· cited 11×
- Olson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-09-23· cited 10×
- State v. DenneySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-12-31· cited 10×
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-07-14· cited 7×
- State v. ParmenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-12-31· cited 7×
- State v. DrewrySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-06-30· cited 5×
- State v. RobidouxSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-06-27· cited 4×
- DeMauro v. DeMauroSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-06-16· cited 4×
- State v. MarchandSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-07-31· cited 4×
- Zyla v. TurnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-05-06· cited 3×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,275×
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-12· cited 762×
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 552×
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1971-01-15· cited 184×
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals· 1978-12-07· cited 175×
- People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-12-23· cited 153×
- People v. SudduthCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-12-23· cited 146×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-04-12· cited 128×
- State v. VietorSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-01-18· cited 95×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1979-01-12· cited 93×
- State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court· 1958-07-30· cited 88×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-08· cited 78×
- Gardner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1954-05-03· cited 72×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.