Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/9/2023
State v. Core
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4061
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress. Neither the initial seizure nor the subsequent search of his person violated appellant's constitutional rights. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 948×
- State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court· 1993-09-22· cited 502×
- State v. ChattonOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 306×
- State v. OjezuaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-22· cited 35×
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-06· cited 23×
- State v. PressleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-07· cited 17×
- State v. GreferOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-10· cited 7×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.