· 11/9/2023
State v. Core
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4061
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress. Neither the initial seizure nor the subsequent search of his person violated appellant's constitutional rights. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Under NEPA, ‘we must ensure that the agency has taken a “hard look” at the environmental consequences of its proposed action. . . . [W]e must defer to an agency’s decision that is “fully informed and well-considered.”’” (alterations in original
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.