Barrows v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although a structural error necessarily satisfies the third prong of plain-error review, a structural error “is not,” by itself, “enough for a court to conclude that the fourth prong is satisfied”
• noting the same obligation and holding that the trial court did not plainly err when it excused prospective jurors for cause because their responses “reasonably could have been perceived as exhibiting actual bias”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).