State v. Neal
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4414
Syllabus
Involuntary manslaughter drug possession consecutive sentence findings R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) clear and convincing mandatory fine affidavit of indigency R.C. 2929.18(B)(1) Reagan Tokes Law indefinite sentence. Affirmed the sentences imposed in appellant's three underlying cases. The trial court made all the required consecutive-sentence findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4), and the consecutive sentences were upheld under R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)'s clear-and-convincing standard. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a mandatory fine after appellant filed an affidavit of indigency under R.C. 2929.18(B)(1). Rejected constitutional challenges to the Reagan Tokes Law.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court· 2017-12-19· cited 273×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
- State v. GipsonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-01-07· cited 186×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-23· cited 142×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-10· cited 90×
- State v. HayesOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-16· cited 10×
- State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-05· cited 8×
- State v. RayOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.