State v. Elliott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering “the circumstances surrounding” defendant’s theft and pos- session of credit cards in concluding that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s MJOA, and noting that the record included testimony that stolen credit cards are “very easy” to use for identity theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-17· cited 3×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-26

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-09-17· cited 134×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 86×
• State v. McAtee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 8×