State v. Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a challenge to an administrative order suspending a driver's license in an appeal from a later criminal conviction for driving after suspension constitutes an impermissible collateral attack on a judgment
• noting that a defendant cannot collaterally attack an administrative order suspending his license in a criminal appeal arising from his conviction for driving after suspension of his drivers' license
• noting that a defendant cannot collaterally attack an administrative order suspending his license in a criminal appeal arising from his conviction for driving after suspension of his drivers’ license
• driver could not collaterally attack validity of license suspension in prosecution for driving after suspension

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Elzie v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 85×
• McIntee v. State, Department of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-05-11· cited 32×
• State v. McFee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-21· cited 22×
• Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-01-21· cited 22×
• State v. Grindling
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-09-19· cited 14×
• State v. Romine
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-12-09· cited 13×
• State v. Putnam
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-09-10· cited 7×
• State v. Hoese
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-18· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Ungar
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-06-10· cited 22×
• Cathy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1966-04-13· cited 10×
• Fernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-06-17· cited 9×
• Wallace v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1965-09-30· cited 6×