Skip to main content
· 7/3/1980

Elzie v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Citations

  • 298 N.W.2d 29
  • 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellant's case was not moot because \he ha[d] not received back his cancelled license\
  • stating that appellant’s case was not moot because “he ha[d] not received back his cancelled license”
  • stating that the standard of review on a motion for dismissal is whether the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief
  • stating that case is not moot notwithstanding termination of license suspensions
  • stating that case is not moot notwithstanding termination of license suspensions
  • sole question before reviewing court is whether complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sheran, Todd, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.