Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/14/2025
State v. Conner
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 861
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress; he was not subject to a custodial interrogation requiring Miranda warnings, and his statements were voluntary. Appellant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,070×
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 769×
- Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court· 2010-02-24· cited 624×
- State v. MasonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-17· cited 600×
- State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court· 1976-12-29· cited 587×
- State v. OtteOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-21· cited 297×
- State v. StrozierOhio Court of Appeals· 2007-08-31· cited 68×
- City of Athens v. WolfOhio Supreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 68×
- State v. OjezuaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-22· cited 35×
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-06· cited 23×
- State v. Thompson-ShabazzOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-01· cited 11×
- State v. ZanOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-22· cited 5×
- State v. SheedersOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-02· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.