Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/21/1982

State v. Conn

Citations

669 P.2d 585
137 Ariz. 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that defendant’s out-of-court statements “were not inadmissible simply because they were self serving,” and an objection on that basis “alone would not be valid”
recognizing that defendant’s out-of-court statements “were not inadmissible simply because they were self serving[,]” and an objection on that basis “alone would not be valid.”
statement was inadmissible, not because it was self-serving, but because it was not spontaneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsall, Howard, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.