State v. Flores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• words of a statute are given their ordinary meaning unless from the context it appears that a different meaning is intended
• words of statute given ordinary meaning unless from context it appears that a different meaning intended
• “In construing a statute, courts should give the statute a sensible construction which will accomplish legislative interest and purpose, and which will avoid absurd results.”
• masturbatory contact must involve at least two persons to constitute “sexual intercourse”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• E.R. v. Department of Child Safety
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-03-05· cited 82×
• State v. Cid
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-03-23· cited 67×
• State v. Siddle
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-07-17· cited 51×
• State v. Barger
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-10-25· cited 42×
• State v. Womack
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-09-29· cited 40×
• State v. Clary
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-01-20· cited 31×
• State v. Duzan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-13· cited 20×
• State v. Crane
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-31· cited 18×
• Ponderosa Fire District v. Coconino County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-08-28· cited 17×
• Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-24· cited 16×
• United States v. J.D. Todd
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-05-19· cited 15×
• State v. Jannamon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-12· cited 11×
• State of Arizona v. Manuel Fernando Florez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-10-25· cited 11×
• State v. Millis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-09· cited 11×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-01-14· cited 5×
• Howard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2004-11-26· cited 4×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-12-16· cited 3×
• State v. Gulli
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-02· cited 2×
• State ex rel. Polk v. Campbell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-08-04· cited 1×
• Ponderosa v. Coconino
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-07-22

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Doyle v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
• State v. Robinson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-04-07· cited 253×
• State v. Sweet
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-16· cited 136×
• State v. Rivera
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-02-16· cited 51×
• State v. Pena
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-20· cited 50×
• Lake Havasu City v. Mohave County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-20· cited 48×
• State v. Burton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 47×
• State v. Tramble
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-02-04· cited 41×
• State v. Pena
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-05-07· cited 38×
• State v. Robles
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-25· cited 35×
• State v. Moore
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 25×
• State v. Conn
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-07-28· cited 21×
• Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 19×
• State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-17· cited 15×
• State v. Kozlowski
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-11-27· cited 15×
• State v. Schoner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-02-27· cited 15×
• State v. Anderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-01-19· cited 15×
• State v. Conn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-12-21· cited 12×
• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-06-27· cited 10×
• State v. Mann
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-12-02· cited 10×