United States v. Gregory W. T. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• witness’s testimony as to his understanding of tape-recorded conversations with defendant admissible because language used was “sharp and abbreviated, composed with unfinished sentences and punctuated with ambiguous references”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).