District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/8/1997
State v. Conforti
Citations
- 688 So. 2d 350
- 1997 WL 4632
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If a statute does not restrict conduct because of the message it expresses, it if is aimed at the ‘noncommunicative impact of an act,’ then the law is ‘content neutral.’ ”
- noting implied privacy right in federal constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Von Eiff v. AzicriSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-11-12· cited 91×
- Shapiro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-23· cited 24×
- Bd. of Co. Com'rs of Palm Beach v. DbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-16· cited 8×
- Konikov v. Orange County, FloridaM.D. Florida· 2004-01-02· cited 7×
- Zile v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-20· cited 6×
- A.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-19· cited 5×
- Daniel v. DanielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08· cited 4×
- Thomas v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-13· cited 4×
- Kortum v. SinkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-29· cited 4×
- McCann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-27· cited 2×
- Dreamland Ballroom & Social Dance Club, Inc. v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-20· cited 1×
- AH v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-19
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,862×
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-06-21· cited 844×
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court· 1973-02-20· cited 833×
- Spence v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 802×
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 752×
- Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 341×
- Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 178×
- Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel WageringSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-10· cited 147×
- Schmitt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 132×
- Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood ServiceSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-01-05· cited 122×
- Chesebrough v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-12-08· cited 100×
- T. B. D. v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1996-02-26· cited 68×
- Shaktman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-10-12· cited 48×
- State v. MozoSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-04-13· cited 40×
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-12-20· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.