State v. Mozo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address whether interception of cordless phone conversations violates the constitutional rights of privacy where the case could be decided on statutory grounds
• declining to address whether interception of cordless phone conversations violates the constitutional rights of privacy where the case could be decided on statutory grounds
• “[T]he ‘intercepted’ conversations originated within the Mozos’ home and thus exhibited the required expectation of privacy demanded by section 934.02(2).”
• “[W]e adhere to the settled principle of constitutional law that courts should endeavor to implement the legislative intent of statutes and avoid constitutional issues.”
• “The actual ‘interception’ of a communication occurs not where such is ultimately heard or recorded but where the communication originates.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).