State v. Colson
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1266
Syllabus
Community-control-sanction violation; hearing; Crim.R. 32.3; minimum requirements of due process. The Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause does not apply to community-control-sanction-violation hearings because they are not criminal prosecutions. Hearsay statements were admissible at defendant's community-control-sanctions-violation hearing as long as there was no due-process violation.
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State ex rel. Mango v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-05-11· cited 15×
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-11· cited 14×
- State v. EnglishOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-18· cited 11×
- State v. GreeneOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 7×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-13· cited 3×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.