State v. Colosimo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “even if such a right did exist, it is not a ‘fundamental right’ ” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Atwood v. Vilsack
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2006-12-29· cited 48×
• State v. Colosimo
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-09-25· cited 19×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carroll v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
• New York v. Burger
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,072×
• United States v. Saundra Prescott
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-09-14· cited 214×
• State v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-11· cited 207×
• Sitz v. Department of State Police
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1993-09-14· cited 139×
• State v. Sorenson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-02· cited 88×
• State v. Nerz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-11-25· cited 33×
• People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lansing Municipal Judge
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1950-01-01· cited 24×
• State v. Tomlin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-02-22· cited 22×
• State v. Linville
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-06· cited 18×
• State v. Greyeagle
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-12-19· cited 10×
• State v. Richards
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-10-12· cited 9×
• State v. Nace
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-04-21· cited 6×
• State v. Henning
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-05-28· cited 3×
• State v. Krenz
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-10-02· cited 3×
• State v. Larsen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-12-26· cited 2×