State v. Nace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an automobile owner’s expectation of privacy in an automobile is somewhat less than in a home, but a warrantless search of an automobile still must be supported by probable cause
• under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement, only probable cause to believe that a car contains contraband is required because of a lower expectation of privacy in a motor vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Seifert
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-04-29· cited 25×
• State v. Bigelow
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-02-09· cited 13×
• State v. Pederson-Maxwell
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-12-05· cited 12×
• State v. Marshall
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-09-01· cited 10×
• State v. Colosimo
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-07-23· cited 3×