Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/5/1994
State v. Colon
Citations
- 230 Conn. 24
- 644 A.2d 877
- 1994 Conn. LEXIS 202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- omission of or defect in jurat does not affect, validity of warrant issued upon probable cause when proven by extrinsic evidence that supporting affidavit properly sworn to
- failure of judge to sign jurat does not render warrant fatally defective if extrinsic evidence proves supporting affidavit properly sworn to by complainants
- ‘‘in determining the adequacy of an affidavit in support of a . . . warrant, the information to establish probable cause must be found within the affidavit’s four corners’’
- “[A]lthough probable cause must be determined from the four corners of the warrant, we are not confined to the four corners of the warrant in determining whether the affidavit in support of probable cause has been validly executed.”
- “[A]lthough probable cause must be determined from the four corners of the warrant, we are not confined to the four corners of the warrant in determining whether the affidavit in support of probable cause has been validly executed.”
- affidavit of judge who signed search warrant admitted into evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Callahan, Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KeithTennessee Supreme Court· 1998-09-28· cited 566×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-04-16· cited 91×
- Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-15· cited 81×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-22· cited 55×
- Stone-Krete Construction, Inc. v. EderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-12-19· cited 52×
- State v. RosarioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 20×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-08-09· cited 15×
- State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-04-21· cited 10×
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-26· cited 7×
- State v. PoliceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-05-10· cited 5×
- State v. JevarjianConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-10-05· cited 5×
- Stone-Krete Const. Inc. v. EderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-12-19
- Smith, Freddie JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-22
- Amended July 5, 2017 State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-04-21
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-10-02· cited 199×
- State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-07· cited 185×
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-17· cited 131×
- Ex Parte Finance America Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-05-08· cited 104×
- United States v. William D. TurnerSecond Circuit· 1977-06-02· cited 89×
- State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-01· cited 88×
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-08-22· cited 72×
- Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-02-09· cited 65×
- H & S TORRINGTON ASSOCIATES v. Lutz Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-12-15· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-25· cited 59×
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-04-21· cited 59×
- State v. DuhanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-28· cited 52×
- State v. GenottiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-01-14· cited 52×
- State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-06-13· cited 51×
- Huff v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1973-03-05· cited 48×
- J. C. Penney Properties, Inc. v. Peter M. Santella Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-28· cited 47×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1969-11-06· cited 45×
- State v. ZarickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-17· cited 45×
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority v. ZitkoSupreme Court of Missouri· 1964-12-14· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.