Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/10/2004
State v. Coleman
Citations
- 100 P.3d 1085
- 196 Or. App. 125
- 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1466
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- police waiting room policy adequately limited discretion where it required “every person” to be searched and prohibited searches of closed containers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. B. A. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 7×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-16· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Department of Justice v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-31· cited 5×
- State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 4×
- State v. BahCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-26
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-24· cited 244×
- State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 164×
- State v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-02· cited 88×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-17· cited 9×
- State v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.