Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/15/1996
State v. Jones
Citations
- 141 Or. App. 41
- 917 P.2d 515
- 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- abuse of discretion occurs when the court’s “discretion is exercised arbitrarily without reason or contrary to law”
- abuse of discretion occurs when the court’s “discretion is exercised arbitrarily without reason or contrary to law”
- issue of what conduct constitutes implied consent or statutory waiver under ORS 131.515(2
- issue of what conduct constitutes implied consent or statutory waiver under ORS 131.515(2) is reviewed without deference on appeal; rejecting the defendant’s argument that appellate court must defer to a trial court’s determination of consent if there is evidence to support it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Edmonds, Riggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-11-26· cited 21×
- State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court· 1979-05-15· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. FrankelOregon Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 16×
- State v. Gehrke-YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-10· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.