Skip to main content

State v. Cofield

Citations

  • 220 Conn. 38
  • 595 A.2d 1349
  • 1991 Conn. LEXIS 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider whether recent United States Supreme Court decision also applied under state constitution when existing federal constitutional law was dispositive
  • declining to consider whether recent United States Supreme Court decision also applied under state constitution when existing federal constitutional law was dispositive
  • \[c]onstitutional issues are not considered unless absolutely necessary to the decision of a case\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “[cjonstitutional issues are not considered unless absolutely necessary to the decision of a case” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • \[c]onstitutional issues are not considered unless absolutely necessary to the decision of a case\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • the court “made clear in Barton that the informant’s ‘veracity,’ ‘reliability,’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ remain ‘highly relevant’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glass, Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.