Skip to main content

State v. Coffee

Citations

  • 54 S.W.3d 231
  • 2001 Tenn. LEXIS 623
  • 2001 WL 984894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, “[w]hen Talley was decided, the requirements now found in Rule 41(c) were codified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-518 (1959)”
  • suppressing evidence gathered pursuant to search warrant where issuing magistrate failed to keep an exact copy of the original as required by Rule 41

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Anderson, Drowota, Holder, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.