State v. Bobadilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a search warrant that was not entered into evidence could be considered on appeal
• recognizing that the search warrant was included in the record that was certified and provided by the trial court clerk to the Court of Criminal Appeals
• holding appellate consideration was proper regarding a copy of a search warrant that was appended to the motion to suppress but not submitted into evidence
• suppressing evidence gathered pursuant to search warrant where issuing magistrate failed to indicate hour at which the warrant was issued as required by Rule 41
• “What is in the record sets the boundaries for what the appellate courts may review, and thus only evidence contained therein can be considered.”
• “What is in the record sets the boundaries for what the appellate courts may review, and thus only evidence contained therein can be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).