Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 11/2/1896

McElroy v. United States

Citations

  • 164 U.S. 76
  • 17 S. Ct. 31
  • 41 L. Ed. 355
  • 1896 U.S. LEXIS 1841

Syllabus

<p>G., B., H., C., S. and J. were indicted April 16 for assault with intent to kill EM.; also, on the same day, for assault with intent to kill SM.; also, May 1, for arson of the dwelling house of EM.; and, on the same 16th of April, G., B. and H. were indicted for arson of the dwelling house of BM. The court ordered the four indictments consolidated. All the defendants except J. were then tried together, and the.trials resulted in separate verdicts of conviction, and the prisoners so convicted were severally sentenced to terms of imprisonment. H'eld, that the several charges in the four indictments were for offences separate and distinct, complete in themselves, independent of each other, and not provable by the same evidence; and that their consolidation was not authorized by Bev. Stat. § 1024.</p> <p>Such a joinder cannot be sustained where the parties are not the same, and where the offences are in nowisé parts of the same transaction, and depend upon evidence of a different state of facts as to each or some of . them.</p>

Judges: Fuller, Brewer, Stufflebeam, Hook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

124 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named McElroy v. United States

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.