State v. Clay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the “func- tional relationship” between the defendant’s behavior and the purpose of the defendant’s behavior, as created by the word “for”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cazee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-27· cited 12×
• State v. Zamora
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-24· cited 8×
• State v. Clay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-08· cited 1×
• State of Missouri v. Jeremy Baum
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2025-03-04
• State of Missouri v. Jeremy Baum
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2024-05-14

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Stull v. Hoke
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-11-14· cited 232×
• Comcast Corp. v. Department of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-10-02· cited 168×
• State v. Murray
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 65×
• State v. Mejia
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-03-04· cited 18×
• State v. Carey-Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-06· cited 14×
• State v. Tilly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 6×
• State v. Makin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-09-15· cited 5×
• State v. Tyson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-05-25· cited 4×
• State v. Reyes-Mauro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-26· cited 4×