State v. Zamora

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, although “the temporal connection between the sexual abuse and the observation of the child’s intimate parts is relevant to that determination, it is not the only relevant fact, and it may not be dispositive”
• explaining that, although “the temporal connection between the sexual abuse and the observation of the child’s intimate parts is relevant to that determination, it is not the only relevant fact, and it may not be dispositive”
• describing ORS 163.670 as capturing “the creation of child pornography”
• describing ORS 163.670 as capturing “the creation of child pornography”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. DiMolfetto
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-06· cited 6×
• State v. Cleaver
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-14· cited 2×
• State v. Zamora
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Owens
  Supreme Court· 1988-02-23· cited 997×
• State v. Parra-Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 13×
• State v. Clay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-26· cited 10×
• State v. Leake
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-29· cited 10×
• State v. Tyson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-05-25· cited 4×
• State v. Hudspeth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-06-20· cited 3×