State v. Clark

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 1869

Syllabus

Appellant's motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his vehicle satisfied the minimum standards of Crim.R. 47 however, appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice from the denial of his motion to suppress without an evidentiary hearing because he affirmatively gave consent for the vehicle search. In pretrial proceedings, appellant disclaimed any facial or as-applied challenge to the statute he was accused of violating therefore, he could not raise such a challenge on appeal.