Skip to main content
· 2/4/2020

Columbus v. Swanson

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 357

Syllabus

Where an expert's proposed testimony was somewhat self-contradictory and based on undisclosed data, undisclosed assumptions, and an undisclosed method, the trial court did not err legally or abuse its discretion in excluding the confusing testimony.

Judges: Brunner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.