Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 142

Syllabus

The State adduced sufficient evidence to support appellant's convictions for two counts of theft, and his convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Furthermore, appellant received the specific sentence that he requested in a sentencing memorandum filed with the trial court. Pursuant to the doctrine of invited error, he cannot now challenge his sentence as being contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.