State v. Davis
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 142
Syllabus
The State adduced sufficient evidence to support appellant's convictions for two counts of theft, and his convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Furthermore, appellant received the specific sentence that he requested in a sentencing memorandum filed with the trial court. Pursuant to the doctrine of invited error, he cannot now challenge his sentence as being contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court· 2005-11-30· cited 390×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. LeopardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
- State v. BentonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-07· cited 38×
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-05· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.