Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 12/28/2000

State v. Clark

Citations

  • 16 P.3d 931
  • 135 Idaho 255
  • 2000 Ida. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “court congestion” is a “neutral factor” in determining the reason for delay that does not override a defendant’s right to a speedy trial
  • clarifying the law by adopting this same analysis in analyzing \good cause\ for delay under Idaho’s speedy trial statute, I.C. § 19-3501
  • finding without further analysis that a witness’s mere inconvenience, as opposed to true unavailability, was insufficient to constitute a legal excuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walters, Trout, Silak, Schroeder, Kidwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.