State v. Condran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in part that the 1987 version of article 28.061 was unconstitutional
• finding that legislature, in enacting article 32.01, “created right in accused to be free from ‘incidental punitive effect’ of incarceration or being held to bail if State is unable to obtain indictment within specified period of time”
• holding in part that the 1987 version of article 28.061 was unconstitutional
• both adopting the Tatum holding after ruling article 28.061 unconstitutional
• both adopting the Tatum holding after ruling article 28.061 unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).