State v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive
• absence of written findings overlooked because oral opinion rendered error harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-12-28· cited 26×
• State v. Ferguson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-17· cited 26×
• State v. Bynum
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-11-28· cited 25×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-17· cited 23×
• State v. Riley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-04-12· cited 23×
• State v. Rowe
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-11-18· cited 18×
• State v. Mitchell
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-08-12· cited 16×
• State v. Cruz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-11-25· cited 14×
• Veith v. Xterra Wetsuits, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-05-01· cited 11×
• State v. Pulido
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-12-21· cited 6×
• State v. Carter
  Washington Supreme Court· 2024-05-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Green
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
• State v. Seagull
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-07-30· cited 263×
• State v. Partin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 222×
• State v. Cord
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-01-10· cited 166×
• State v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-09-15· cited 39×
• State v. Riley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-28· cited 33×
• State v. Hoyt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-05-18· cited 27×