State v. Bynum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an appellate court may use the trial court’s oral ruling to interpret [consistent] written findings and conclusions”
• trial court’s comprehensive oral ruling used to determine that State proved essential elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hescock
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-22· cited 56×
• Brin v. Stutzman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-02· cited 49×
• State v. Jacobson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-02· cited 21×
• State v. Ward
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-10· cited 17×
• State v. Mitchell
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-08-12· cited 16×
• State v. Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-11-24· cited 15×
• State v. Huddleston
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-03-22· cited 12×
• Wesco Distribution, Inc. v. M.A. Mortenson Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-11-10· cited 12×
• Lincoln C. Beauregard v. Mayor Edward Murray
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-10-08· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 72×
• State v. McGary
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-06-18· cited 58×
• State v. Souza
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-02-11· cited 33×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-17· cited 23×
• State v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-02-23· cited 17×
• State v. Moon
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-13· cited 12×
• State v. Austin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-04· cited 8×