Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/8/2012
State v. Chouinard
Citations
- 169 Wash. App. 895
- 282 P.3d 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that backseat passenger’s proximity to a weapon and knowledge of its presence in a vehicle was not enough to establish constructive possession
- reviewing cases where courts found sufficient evidence of dominion and control and “the defendant was either the owner of the premises or the driver/owner of the vehicle where contraband was found”
- “Courts have found sufficient evidence of constructive possession, and dominion and control, in cases in which the defendant was either the owner of the premises or the driver/owner of the vehicle where contraband was found.”
- mere proximity insufficient to show dominion and control
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt, Johanson, Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Of Washington v. James H. ListoeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-11-10· cited 39×
- Brett Bass, Respondents/cross-app. v. City Of Edmonds, Apps./cross-resp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-02-22· cited 6×
- State of Washington v. Ismael M. TarangoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-01-31
- State Of Washington, V. Jesus H. Ibarra-erivesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2022-09-19
- State Of Washington, V. Samuel Leon DuganCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2026-04-20
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- State v. HosierWashington Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 167×
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court· 2000-07-27· cited 82×
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-22· cited 71×
- State v. EcheverriaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-17· cited 66×
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-13· cited 56×
- State v. RaleighCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-09-08· cited 54×
- State v. HystadCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-11-03· cited 37×
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-09-21· cited 35×
- State v. CoteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-15· cited 32×
- State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-04-17· cited 27×
- State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-19· cited 26×
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-18· cited 25×
- State v. CoteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-19· cited 24×
- State v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-22· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.