State v. Cote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the State did not claim that the defendant had actual possession of drugs and there was insufficient evidence to prove constructive possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. George
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-13· cited 56×
• State v. Chouinard
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-08· cited 43×
• State Of Washington v. James H. Listoe
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-11-10· cited 39×
• State v. Manion
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-19· cited 33×
• State v. Cote
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-19· cited 24×
• State v. Enlow
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-03-06· cited 10×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-20· cited 9×
• State Of Washington, V Eddie Davis, Douglas Davis, Letricia Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-20
• State v. Cote
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-15
• State Of Washington, V. Jesus H. Ibarra-erives
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-09-19

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Green
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
• State v. Partin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 222×
• State v. Callahan
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 191×
• State v. Gosby
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-08-28· cited 153×
• State v. Spruell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-03-26· cited 64×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-11-05· cited 55×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-01-16· cited 44×
• State v. Cantabrana
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-26· cited 41×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-21· cited 24×
• State v. Plank
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-02-02· cited 18×