Texas Supreme Court· 11/20/2009
State v. Central Expressway Sign Associates
Citations
- 302 S.W.3d 866
- 53 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 134
- 2009 Tex. LEXIS 967
- 2009 WL 3969544
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the “complaining party must only show ‘that the exclusion of evidence probably resulted in the rendition of an improper judgment’” (quoting McCraw v. Maris, 828 S.W.2d 756, 758 (Tex. 1992) (internal citation omitted))
- noting “[t]he income approach is appropriate when the property would be priced according to the rental income it generates”
- requiring review of record to determine if excluded evidence probably resulted in rendition of improper judgment
- stating standard does not require complaining party “to prove that ‘but for’ the exclusion of evidence, a different judgment would necessarily have resulted”
- stating standard does not require complaining party “to prove that ‘but for’ the exclusion of evidence, a different judgment would necessarily have resulted”
- noting “[t]he income approach is appropriate when the property would be priced according to the rental income it generates”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Neill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
227 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Waffle House, Inc. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court· 2010-06-11· cited 477×
- Garcia v. GomezTexas Supreme Court· 2010-08-27· cited 211×
- in Re Commitment of Michael BohannanTexas Supreme Court· 2012-08-31· cited 142×
- in the Interest of D.O., S.O., and M.L.O., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2011-01-20· cited 99×
- in the Interest of E.G., Minor ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2012-02-29· cited 92×
- Caffe Ribs, Incorporated v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court· 2016-04-01· cited 68×
- Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2012-03-19· cited 49×
- Collin County v. Hixon Family Partnership, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2012-05-09· cited 43×
- in the Interest of Z.M., W.M., and L.M., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-01-23· cited 41×
- Dallas County v. Crestview Corners Car WashCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2012-02-16· cited 39×
- Fredrick Merida Warriner v. Dana Dian WarrinerTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2012-09-05· cited 32×
- Garden Ridge, L.P. v. Clear Lake Center, L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-09-29· cited 32×
- Discovery Operating, Inc. v. BP America Production Co.Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2010-04-15· cited 25×
- Puentes v. FANNIE MAETex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2011-08-31· cited 24×
- Estate of R.H.\Jack\ Finney,Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-08-30· cited 24×
- Riner v. NeumannCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2011-11-16· cited 24×
- In the Interest of R.M.T., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-10-05· cited 20×
- Stearns v. MartensCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-27· cited 20×
- Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Morris, DavidTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-05-29· cited 19×
- in the Interest of A.L.D.H., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2012-06-25· cited 17×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court· 1997-11-13· cited 3,583×
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court· 2001-04-26· cited 1,137×
- Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1989-02-15· cited 735×
- McCraw v. MarisTexas Supreme Court· 1992-06-10· cited 341×
- Exxon Pipeline Co. v. ZwahrTexas Supreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 328×
- Porras v. CraigTexas Supreme Court· 1984-07-11· cited 255×
- Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. v. SevcikTexas Supreme Court· 2008-09-26· cited 185×
- City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court· 2001-05-17· cited 171×
- Lorusso v. Members Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1980-07-30· cited 124×
- Religious of the Sacred Heart of Texas v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court· 1992-07-01· cited 116×
- City of Dallas v. PrioloTexas Supreme Court· 1951-07-18· cited 75×
- Polk County v. Tenneco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1977-07-20· cited 69×
- City of Austin v. Avenue Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1986-01-22· cited 58×
- Aronoff v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1958-09-02· cited 38×
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-04-11· cited 32×
- Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-10-09· cited 32×
- Urban Renewal Agency v. TrammelTexas Supreme Court· 1966-10-25· cited 28×
- Lower Nueces River Water Supply District v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1959-02-18· cited 28×
- Herndon v. Housing Authority of City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1953-07-24· cited 23×
- State v. WareTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-11-07· cited 23×
Other cases named State v. Central Expressway Sign Associates
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-12-06· cited 4×
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court· 2009-11-20
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court· 2009-06-26
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court· 2009-06-26
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.