Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court‘s belief that the testimony had no relevance other than to unfairly prejudice the jury was not arbitrary or unreasonable
• holding that the trial court’s belief that the testimony had no relevance other than to unfairly prejudice the jury was not arbitrary or unreasonable
• \We therefore do not address Waffle House's second issue of whether Williams's alternative trial theories can support the judgment.\
• “We therefore do not address Waffle House’s second issue of whether Williams’s alternative trial theories can support the judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).