Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/11/2011
State v. Castro
Citations
- 159 Wash. App. 340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding closed pretrial hearing did not implicate public trial right because “the matters addressed did not involve any fact finding required to be open to the public”
- pretrial hearing addressing whether to exclude witnesses and whether the State could impeach the defendant with prior criminal history
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Korsmo, Siddoway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 405×
- State v. MomahWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 239×
- Allied Daily Newspapers v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court· 1993-04-01· cited 195×
- State v. EasterlingWashington Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 167×
- State v. StrodeWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 137×
- State v. SublettCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-18· cited 72×
- State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-14· cited 48×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-08· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.