Arizona Supreme Court· 10/6/1987
State v. Cartwright
Citations
- 746 P.2d 478
- 155 Ariz. 308
- 1987 Ariz. LEXIS 200
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- witness not involved in pretrial identification procedure or Dessureault hearing could nonetheless identify defendant for first time at trial
- “[T]here was no need to hold a Dessureault hearing because the witness had not participated in any pretrial identification procedures.”
- no need for second Dessureault hearing when witness identified defendant for first time at trial and was thoroughly cross-examined
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moeller, Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 138×
- State v. ViaArizona Supreme Court· 1985-06-12· cited 90×
- State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-28· cited 70×
- State v. McGannArizona Supreme Court· 1982-04-30· cited 66×
- State v. ReinholdArizona Supreme Court· 1979-05-31· cited 39×
- State v. BowieArizona Supreme Court· 1978-06-23· cited 34×
- State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 26×
- State v. JamisonArizona Supreme Court· 1974-01-16· cited 20×
- State v. MauroArizona Supreme Court· 1986-02-25· cited 18×
- State v. MikelsArizona Supreme Court· 1978-04-11· cited 7×
- State v. MolinaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-06-06· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.