Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 141 Conn. App. 377
  • 61 A.3d 1103
  • 2013 WL 900335
  • 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • focusing on what actor has done and not what remains to be done as applied to facts of case
  • \prospective nature\ of statements made by hand-cuffed defendant did not necessarily make statements \merely repugnant acts of puffery\ rather than true threats
  • defendant's change of mind and abandonment of original purpose to shoot and injure victim was irrelevant because, by that time, attempt crime already completed
  • defendant’s change of mind and abandonment of original purpose to shoot and injure victim was irrelevant because, by that time, attempt crime already completed
  • defendant’s change of mind and abandonment of original purpose to shoot and injure victim was irrelevant because, by that time, attempt crime already completed
  • threats while defendant was incarcerated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alvord, Sheldon, West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.