Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/29/1986
State v. Carter
Citations
- 200 Conn. 607
- 513 A.2d 47
- 1986 Conn. LEXIS 895
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- conducting independent review of record to determine if request was clear and unequivocal
- in absence of clear and unequivocal assertion of right to self-representation, trial court has no independent obligation to inquire into defendant’s interest in representing himself
- ambiguous requests for self-representation not renewed after explanations provided for trial procedures and opportunities given to consult with counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BurtonIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 187×
- United States v. Robert MartinezNinth Circuit· 1989-08-23· cited 145×
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-27· cited 107×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-04-14· cited 74×
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-19· cited 56×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-03-13· cited 52×
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-16· cited 41×
- State v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-09-15· cited 33×
- State v. CasadoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-07-30· cited 25×
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-05-29· cited 24×
- State v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-05-15· cited 19×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-07-25· cited 13×
- State v. TurnerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-28· cited 11×
- State v. FlanaganConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-01-31· cited 8×
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-31· cited 8×
- State v. PiresConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-07-27· cited 7×
- State v. FlanaganConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-03· cited 5×
- State v. PaschalConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-09-07· cited 5×
- Massey Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-11-09· cited 3×
- State v. AcamporaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-09-05· cited 2×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 606×
- People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-03-15· cited 383×
- United States v. Welty, John JacobThird Circuit· 1982-03-02· cited 263×
- United States v. Odell BennettTenth Circuit· 1976-06-28· cited 196×
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 169×
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-05-30· cited 167×
- United States v. Raphael PlattnerSecond Circuit· 1964-03-31· cited 156×
- State v. HegwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-05-16· cited 132×
- State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-09-25· cited 115×
- The United States of America v. Ronald Paul DujanovicNinth Circuit· 1973-10-15· cited 110×
- Jerry Carlo Moreno v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, and Jim Mattox, Attorney General of the State of TexasFifth Circuit· 1983-10-14· cited 108×
- United States v. Clifford Bailey, United States of America v. Ronald Clifton Cooley, United States of America v. Ralph WalkerD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 90×
- State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-03· cited 82×
- State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-03· cited 76×
- Russell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-12-15· cited 70×
- United States v. Jack AponteNinth Circuit· 1978-09-07· cited 69×
- Joseph Anthony Meeks v. Walter Craven, WardenNinth Circuit· 1973-07-20· cited 67×
- Hill v. McKaskleSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.